What you can do here

Remember Registered Users can :-

  • Publish their Opinions
  • Create a profile
  • Private Message users
  • Ask questions in the forum
  • Answer forum questions
  • Comment on opinions
  • Comment on & rate news
Register Now!

Feeds

Get this site in your RSS reader
Home arrow Forums
Company Law
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Dismissing a rogue director...[MOVED] (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Dismissing a rogue director...[MOVED]
#321
JoePublic (User)
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 3
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Dismissing a rogue director...[MOVED] 3 Years, 9 Months ago  
[Moved to 'Directors Duties' Forum]


Hi,

We have a problem with a company director who's gone rogue on us.

There's 4 shareholders, each with 25% shareholding, and 3 of us making up the majority, want to dismiss the director (the 4th 25% shareholder).

He is the sole director, as we hadn't felt the need at the time for more than that.

He's causing huge problems right now. We've called a 21 day shareholders meeting, informing him that we'll be voting to dismiss him at this meeting.

Thing is, he's also a bank signatory, and he's cleaned out the account, too!

He also happened to be the person that physically signed the office lease on behalf of the company, has instructed the building management to lock us out of the office, and they're saying they have to oblige because he signed the lease, despite the fact that the majority shareholders have requested they allow us access.

We've even shown them minutes of last shareholders meeting, signed by the director in question, which outlined his reduced role within the company and detailed that ALL financial dealings be conducted solely by one of the other shareholders.

I guess we should have seen this coming, hence the reason we reduced his role in the company in the first place. But, we just didn't think he'd be this outrageous in his behaviour.

Is there no emergency measures shareholders can take to stop a director from destroying a company in what will probably take him less time than the statutory 21 days it'll take to meet and dismiss him?

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Many thanks,

Del.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2008/08/22 04:11 By JoePublic. Reason: Put question in wrong thread.
  only registered users can start threads and reply to posts.
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
Halsbury House, 35 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1EL
Customer Services 0845 370 1234

Polls

What's your biggest concern for your business
 

Login

Advertisement

Opinions from

Susan Henderson (2 entries)
Tolleys Directors Duties (4 entries)
Margaret Cassidy (1 entries)
Kathryn Cearns (1 entries)
Peter Kennerley (1 entries)
David Williams (1 entries)
Grant Dawson (1 entries)
Stephen Barc (3 entries)
Cara Annett (3 entries)
Easy Rider (1 entries)

Who's Online

No Users Online