What you can do here

Remember Registered Users can :-

  • Publish their Opinions
  • Create a profile
  • Private Message users
  • Ask questions in the forum
  • Answer forum questions
  • Comment on opinions
  • Comment on & rate news
Register Now!

Feeds

Get this site in your RSS reader
Home arrow Cases arrow Case: Jirehouse Capital and Another v Beller and another
Case: Jirehouse Capital and Another v Beller and another PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Written by Calum Haswell   
Monday, 04 August 2008

 Chancery Division

 

Briggs J 

 

16 January 2008

 

Costs – Security for costs – Company – Unlimited company – Whether court having jurisdiction to make order – CPR Pt 25(13)(c).

 

The first claimant was an unlimited company whose only shareholder was SJ. The second claimant was a limited company and was wholly owned by the first claimant. Both companies were incorporated in the United Kingdom. Following the issue of proceedings, the defendants sought, inter alia, security for costs, in respect of the first defendant, for £150,000, representing the costs of the proceedings incurred by him to date, and, in respect of the second defendant, £252,000, reflecting 60% of her estimated costs of the action.

The claimants argued that the defendants' application under CPR 25(13)(c) could not succeed as the court had no jurisdiction to order security for costs against an unlimited company incorporated within the jurisdiction

Part 25(13)(c) of the CPR plainly contemplated security for costs to be ordered against any corporate body anywhere.

In the circumstances of the instant case, there was a significant danger that the companies would not pay a costs award that might be made against them. On the evidence, the court should exercise its discretion to award the security for costs sought.

Security in the sums of £150,000 and £252,000 would be paid into court in relation to the claims made against the first and second defendants.

 

Stephen Auld QC and Jonathan Caplan (instructed by Mischon De Reya) for the claimant.

James Aldridge (instructed by Harbottle & Lewis) for the first defendant.

Tom Weisselberg (instructed by Byrne & Partners) for the second defendant.

 

 

Gareth Williams Barrister.

 

 

Full case on LNB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Add as favourites (214) | Quote this on your site | Views: 17783

  Comments (1)
1. Written by robertgoddard, on 27-08-2008 14:17
On July 30th the Court of Appeal gave judgment in this case - see: 
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/908.html

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

 
< Prev   Next >
Halsbury House, 35 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1EL
Customer Services 0845 370 1234

Polls

Do you believe that there will be a ‘double dip’?
 

Login

Advertisement

Opinions from

Susan Henderson (2 entries)
Tolleys Directors Duties (4 entries)
Margaret Cassidy (1 entries)
Kathryn Cearns (1 entries)
Peter Kennerley (1 entries)
David Williams (1 entries)
Grant Dawson (1 entries)
Jonathan Djanogly MP (1 entries)
Stephen Barc (3 entries)
Jane Pallant (1 entries)

Who's Online

No Users Online